BEING HUMAN IN THE AGE OF AI - A PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATION

As artificial intelligence increasingly permeates our daily lives, a fundamental question resurfaces with renewed urgency: what does it mean to be human? As machines begin to mimic our cognitive abilities, create art, hold conversations and even display reasoning that appears intelligent, the boundaries that once clearly delineated humanity from technology have blurred. This exploration is not merely academic. It strikes at the core of our identity and purpose in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

Throughout intellectual history, philosophers have offered diverse frameworks for understanding what makes us distinctly human. These perspectives provide valuable lenses through which we can examine our relationship with artificial intelligence.

THE ARISTOTELIAN VIEW - HUMANS AS RATIONAL ANIMALS

Aristotle defined humans as "rational animals", suggesting our capacity for reason distinguishes us from other beings. In his Nicomachean Ethics, he proposed that human flourishing comes from exercising our unique rational faculties in accordance with virtue.

In the AI context, Aristotle might question: if machines can reason, calculate and solve problems, often surpassing human capabilities, what remains uniquely human? Perhaps the Aristotelian answer lies not in raw computational power but in our capacity to deliberate about what constitutes the good life and to exercise practical wisdom in pursuing it.

THE CARTESIAN PERSPECTIVE - CONSCIOUSNESS AND SELF-AWARENESS

Descartes' famous declaration "Cogito, ergo sum" ("I think, therefore I am") established consciousness and self-awareness as foundational to human identity. His mind-body dualism positioned mental experiences as the essence of the self.

Today's AI systems process information but do not possess subjective inner experiences or consciousness as we understand it. The "hard problem of consciousness" identified by philosopher David Chalmers remains uniquely human - the qualitative, first-person experience of being. While AI can simulate emotional responses or creative outputs, it lacks the phenomenological experience of emotion or inspiration.

THE EMPIRICAL TRADITION - EXPERIENCE AND EMBODIMENT

From Locke to Hume, empiricists emphasised that human understanding derives from sensory experience. Our knowledge and identity emerge through physical interaction with the world, suggesting that embodiment is essential to being human.

Modern AI, despite its sophisticated algorithms, lacks embodied experience. It processes data but doesn't feel the weight of a book, taste sweetness, or experience the warmth of human touch. Even as robotics advances, the richness of human sensory experience - and how it shapes our consciousness - remains beyond technological replication.

PHENOMENOLOGY AND EMBODIED COGNITION

Philosophers like Maurice Merleau-Ponty emphasised that human consciousness is fundamentally embodied, i.e. our thinking is inseparable from our physical existence. This perspective suggests that human understanding, unlike AI processing, emerges from our bodily engagement with the world.

Contemporary philosophers like Hubert Dreyfus and Andy Clark have extended this tradition, arguing that true intelligence requires not just processing power but enactive engagement with environments through bodies that have evolved alongside those environments.

RELATIONAL PERSPECTIVES - HUMANS AS SOCIAL BEINGS

Hannah Arendt and Martin Buber emphasised that being human involves authentic relationships. Buber's "I-Thou" relationship, recognising the full humanity of others, differs fundamentally from the "I-It" relationship where others are treated instrumentally. AI, regardless of its sophistication, remains in the realm of "It," incapable of genuine reciprocal relationships.

Social philosopher Martha Nussbaum's capabilities approach likewise emphasises aspects of humanity that transcend computation such as meaningful social affiliation, emotional development and practical reason directed towards good lives.

REIMAGINING HUMAN IDENTITY IN THE AGE OF AI

Perhaps the most profound contribution of the AI revolution is not technological but philosophical. It compels us to reconsider what makes us human. As machines become increasingly capable, we're encouraged to look beyond raw computational ability to deeper aspects of human experience:

Being Human as Ethical Agency

Unlike AI systems, humans possess moral agency - the capacity to make ethical judgments based on values that transcend algorithmic calculation. While AI can be programmed with ethical guidelines, it cannot authentically care about ethics or experience moral emotions like empathy, indignation or compassion.

We wrestle with ethical dilemmas not through computation but through a complex interplay of reason, emotion and experience. This moral capacity demands reflective judgment that goes beyond following rules. It requires us to consider context, weigh competing values and take responsibility for our choices.

Being Human as Meaning-Making

Humans create meaning in ways that AI cannot replicate. We construct narratives about our lives, pursue purposes that matter to us personally and forge identities through choices that reflect our deepest values. This meaning-making capacity, perhaps our most profound freedom, distinguishes us from even the most sophisticated algorithms.

AI can generate text that discusses meaning but it cannot authentically experience existential questions or the search for purpose. The drive to find meaning in our experiences, relationships and endeavours remains uniquely human, even in the most challenging circumstances.

Being Human as Creative Imagination

While AI can now generate impressive artistic outputs, there's a fundamental difference between recombining existing patterns and the type of creativity that emerges from lived experience. Human creativity springs from our cultural participation, personal struggles, dreams and the mysterious depths of consciousness.

When we create, we're not just arranging data points. We're expressing something authentic about our inner lives and our understanding of the world. This form of creativity, rooted in genuine experience and emotion, represents a distinctly human contribution that complements rather than competes with AI-generated content.

INTEGRATING HUMANITY AND TECHNOLOGY

As we navigate the AI revolution, the question is not whether machines will replace humans but how we might integrate technological tools while preserving and enhancing what makes us distinctly human. This requires developing approaches that neither fear AI nor surrender human uniqueness to it.

We stand at a pivotal moment where we must make conscious choices about how AI serves us. By grounding these choices in reflection on human nature, we can develop technologies that enhance rather than diminish our humanity.

The key lies in recognising what makes us human. Being human in the age of AI means embracing our capacity for embodied experience, authentic relationships, ethical reasoning, empathic understanding and the distinctly human drive to create purpose and meaning from our experiences. Rather than competing with AI, we can forge productive partnerships that enhance our humanity while leveraging technological capabilities. The most sophisticated algorithms, for all their impressive capabilities, remain tools through which we can better understand and express our humanity rather than replacements for it.

--

At unorthodox, I turn teams into trailblazers.

AI is reshaping how we work so what it means to be human has never mattered more. Organisations are embracing AI, yet many struggle to adapt human roles and identities to this new paradigm.

That's why I'm currently piloting the Uranian Framework, which aims to help teams reimagine their identity, creativity and purpose in the age of AI. If you're curious how it can empower your team in this new paradigm, [ CLICK HERE ] to register your interest.

To learn more about unorthodox, [ CLICK HERE ]